I haven’t linked a bunch of the “sustainable thanksgiving” and “eat local for thanksgiving” and “meatless thanksgiving” posts this year simply because they’re everywhere already- I’m sure if you’re inclined to read news, you’ve run across a few already. Seen any you particularly liked?
I would like to highlight an anti-sustainable thanksgiving article, though, from one of the hopefully well-meaning people at the NRO. Normally, I try not to get worked up about ludicrous opinion pieces at small ideologically-driven organizations. But this column has an insidious message about the importance of personal decisions that I’ve heard echoed other places, plus it’s especially ludicrous, so I’d like to address it directly and completely.
The piece: James Robbins is doing his darnedest to convince us that worrying about sustainability and environmental impact at Thanksgiving is not the point of the holiday, and useless effort anyhow. Thanksgiving is instead, for
gathering with family and friends, feasting, having fun, and not worrying about consequences.
Family! Friends! Feasting! Fun! No consequences! Wait a minute, why is the conservative advocating irresponsibility? Also, I have no idea what he means by not worrying about consequences, unless he’s the guy who ends up watching football on the couch after the meal until the magic dishwashing fairies come.
Now, my Slavic Rituals and Demonology professor (less interesting than it sounds, the way she taught it) explained how organized societies have festival days where rules don’t apply and everybody wears their pants backwards or whatever so those all those anti-social tendencies we have get let loose in an “acceptable” manner. This is a good idea, and also really fun. I’m all for Mr. Robbins being as anti-social as he likes on Thanksgiving. But I will not allow him to malign the efforts of good, thoughtful people who want to live good, thoughtful lives- and bust a gut on local squash while they’re at it. Burp.
First, James equates a concern for the environment with a denial of real celebration. Apparently, people who buy local food aren’t enjoying the holiday as much, since they don’t just buy whatever’s in the main aisle at the national grocery chain? It’s nice of Mr. Robbins to be concerned for their total experience, but his premise is nonsense. I invite him to wander the Whole Foods cheese department, then come back and explain to me again how organic types are bad at eating.
Mr. Robbins’ conclusion- that since it’s one day and the relative environmental impact of buying squash is small, there’s no point (and stop ruining his mindless overindulgent fun with your thoughts and calculations!)- is a petty and cynical one (n. b., this cynicism also undermines his own thesis of heart-and-not-head felt holidays). Yes, if one person skips turkey or buys local side dishes, carbon emissions don’t go down very much. But they will go down. And a lot of one persons making these decisions? I presume you can add.
Oh, also, he’s trying to downplay your individual impact. He says human impact accounts for 10% or less of carbon emissions around the globe. He does not cite this, he just says it. But, in reality, Americans control (directly or indirectly) 65% of the greenhouse gas emissions in the US. The rest of the world manages to influence 43% of the GHG emitted. Remember this WSJ article? Cited! I know it pains Mr. Robbins to remember it, but our individual choices matter.
So, go ahead, please have your sustainable Thanksgiving. Revel in it, and be thankful you have the wherewithal and time to enjoy it. Rejoice in the choices we have to live more sustainably, and appreciate that more and more people want to know how they can live better and softer on this earth. Call your distant relatives and say hi. Then, don’t eat a turkey leg for Mr. Robbins. Maybe he’ll thank you later.